
Building Digital
Collections
University of Iowa Libraries
Friday, December 12, 1997
Discussion Group
1
John Forys - Discussion Leader
Michael Levine-Clark - Recorder
Question #1: What do we want digital collections for
the campus to accomplish?
provide better service to patrons
provide access to unique materials (unavailable
otherwise)
provide access to materials available elsewhere (but
previously unavailable here)
provide digital access to formerly non-digital material
have a greater variety of access points
make greater use of collections
use digitization to preserve materials
provide cross-platform/database searching
make full use of what we already have, whatís
already been developed
generate publicity for the library
There was interest in developing an income-generating
project, some examples given were JSTOR, Art & Life in
Africa, and UI Foundation software developed for on-site use
and now being sold for a profit.
Some common themes that arose in the discussion of
question one:
We want to provide better service.
We would like to provide greater access.
We want to make data available in a greater number of
ways.
Question #2: What needs to be addressed in the design
of the collection?
If we are going to work with a variety of
platforms, we will need a standardized interface. The WWW is
a good example of the ease of use that uniformity brings.
We wondered who would be involved in the design process.
Vendors, library consortia, publishers would all have to
participate.
How should librarians be involved?
One means of involvement for librarians should be
participation on standards committees.
We were concerned about "understandability" ñ
knowing how the system works on all levels (interface,
software, hardware, content). One potential problem:
proprietary algorithms owned by OVID for example.
Features that interested us:
a. The capability to do profiling
b. The possibilities of "push" technology.
Some additional issues:
a. Make sure that the system is flexible.
b. Will there be a loss of mediation by the librarian?
c. What about copyright/licensing issues?
Our main concerns:
a. Make sure that there are standards in place.
b. The system must have built in flexibility ñ so
that it can be added to, adapted to changing issues.
c. "Understandability" ñ We must be able to
understand enough about how it works to explain it to users.
d. It must be easy to use and simple to navigate so that
anyone can use it.
e. There must be some way of maintaining privacy for
users (maximum access. with maximum. privacy).
Question #3: Beyond design, what are the three most
pressing issues facing this university as we begin to
address building digital collections?
Resources/Money. Do we transfer funds/staff
away from books? Will other resources suffer?
Adequate staff. Will we need to hire more staff, staff
with different sets of skills?
Publicity. It will be important to make our users aware
of our digital collections.
The campus infrastructure will have to be updated. This
includes wiring, hardware, and software.
The content of digital collections must reflect the
missions and goals of the Libraries and the University. We
need to set priorities as to which collections to pursue in
light of fact of limited funding.
It will be necessary to identify our audience and
potential partnerships (beyond CIC).
On campus, we should coordinate with other
departments/collections.
The major issues for this section were:
Resources. If we have limited resources,
where does a digital collection fit in? Should it be a
priority?
Infrastructure. In order for digital collections to be a
possibility, the campus must be fully wired and the latest
hardware and software must be available.
Audience. We must be aware of who our users are. This can
help guide content.
Content. Content should reflect the mission of the
Libraries. Can also guide who the audience will be.
Question #4: a) How might workflow in support units
change (in library and on campus?
As the collections become digital, and thus
no longer tied to one physical place, we envision
consultations occurring outside of the library (This is
already happening). Librarians will go to offices and
classrooms to help use resources.
As users become used to the idea that digital information
comes to them, there may be increased demand for delivery of
materials in all formats.
As services change, will we want to charge?
If so, there will likely be tiered services. For
instance, students may get free service, while researchers
with grants may need to pay.
We will need to consider outsourcing (of scanning,
coding, indexing) in order to complete our tasks. It is
possible that as we gain expertise, other libraries could
outsource to us.
Question #4: b) What tools/skills should be the focus
for the next 3-5 years?
We will need to learn about fundraising and
grant writing.
We will have to understand intellectual property issues.
There will be design issues to be studied.
We will have to study prototyping.
We should learn how to conduct user-needs assessments
In order to promote our digital collections, we will need
marketing skills.
We must learn programming and other technical skills.
At the same time, it is important to keep up with basic
skills such as cataloging.
Human skills (public service skills) will still be
important as well.
We were struck by the fact that we discussed
business skills before computer skills came up. This may
have something to do with our discussions prior to this
question. In general, we saw a need to learn business and
technical (computer) skills while preserving traditional
library skills and maintaining a focus on human skills.
Question #5: We did not get to question #5.
Discussion Group
2 [top]
Jim Loter - Discussion Leader
Sandra Ballasch - Recorder
Question #1: What do we want digital
collections for the campus to accomplish?
The major goals/objectives of digital collections would
include enhanced access to, preservation of and efficiency
of use of these new resources. In addition, the nature of
digital resources makes possible the provision of added
value elements to resources that already exist in the
traditional print and micro formats. The promotion of these
new resources would not only make our patrons aware of them
but also promote the library and its services anew to them.
This is going to be necessary if the library is to continue
to make an effort to be included at ever earlier stages in
the scholarly publication process.
Some additional concerns and issues:
Provide access to special collections that are difficult
to access in their original format due to factors such as
rarity, fragility, etc.
Cut down on the need for duplication of expensive titles.
Because of the nature of the Internet and the WWW digital
collections can provide greater visibility for the library
and our collections as well as greater access to the
individual resources themselves. Such things as multiple
search access points and various ways of capturing the
results of searches would be possible in a digital format.
The involvement of the library in the digitization
process can help move the library into a more prominent
position in the publication process. We would become
partners with the creators instead of simply customers.
Question #2: What needs to be addressed in the design
of the collection?
The infrastructure (hardware, software and
staff resources) necessary to provide and support these new
resources must be flexible enough to adapt to the nature of
digital collections.
Consideration needs to be given to how to both take
advantage of the capabilities of the digital format and
still protect the intellectual integrity of the source
material.
How the necessary collaboration with internal operations
(ITS, departments, etc.) and external entities (other
universities, other libraries, etc.) will be structured.
An effort needs to be made to collect information on who
the users of these collections are and what they "want"
and/or "need".
The addition of digital collection to our existing mix
make even more imperative that the library continue to
inform our users in the areas of critical thinking skills. A
continued emphasis on the development of traditional
research skills will become even more important and more and
more electronic resources are added to the mix. Ease of
searching does not guarantee a quality result
Some additional concerns and issues:
Development of uniform front-end interfaces to these new
resources.
The university must have a better grasp of the knowledge
base of our students, staff and faculty as well as what
those outside the organization know and are doing.
Collaboration then becomes a necessity for survival.
Coordination of efforts and expression of needs with
other producers (commercial, other libraries or
universities) is a vital next step. These efforts would need
to include such concerns as standardization of such things
as encoding methods.
Priorities of materials to actually be digitized will
need to be determined.
Question #3: Beyond design, what are the three most
pressing issues facing this university as we begin to
address building digital collections?
It is important that the university continue
to address the campus-wide organizational structure to
ensure that cooperation and collaboration between
individuals and departments will be encouraged and enabled.
The technical expertise of the university community among
both the academic staff, including faculty, staff, students
and the technical staff continues to grow. And grow
together.
The issue of intellectual property rights, copyright,
must continue to be addressed by the university community.
Some additional concerns and issues:
Money
Rights management
User and staff education efforts
Question #4: How might workflow in support units
change?
Some processes and procedures will be
automated in one degree or another. For example, in
cataloging such activities as authority processing, could be
automated to a greater degree than is currently possible.
The relationships between the public and technical
services operations will continue to evolve and change. Some
activities may well disappear and other change from one
operation to another. Collaborative relationships will
become ever more necessary to work in a more digitized
environment. Not only within the library but between the
library and such operations as The Center for Teaching, ITS,
etc.
Some additional concerns and issues:
Prospect of staff turnover from retirements in the next
decade. Much knowledge of the campus and library will be
lost.
The possibility of telecommuting or distance users will
need to be addressed in terms of hardware software and staff
and staff training initiatives.
The possibility of more interactive applications and the
infrastructure to support them.
The need for an inventory of existing technologies and
expertise in the library, ITS, etc.
Question #5: How can we best promote the availability
and use of new digital collections?
We need to continue to build a network of
advocates for the library and its services in academic
departments on campus.
We need to work with "early adapters" of technology among
the faculty and staff.
Both of these endeavors will help to make the library
more visible to upper administration and promote our
activities and needs.
All of the above can be done using a mix of traditional
media channels (i.e. The Daily Iowan, The FYI, etc.) and new
publicity and public relations channels as they develop.
Some additional concerns and issues:
The need for strong support from the university
administration at the highest levels.
A more effective use of LWIS as a resource.
More presentations and publications by library staff - to
increase the visibility of the library, such as talking to
classes and other course integrated instruction.
The need to move on a next generation ILS.
Discussion Group
3 [top]
Jean Donham - Discussion Leader
Karen Zimmerman - Recorder
Question #1: What do we want Digital Collections to
accomplish for this campus?
Better access to full text such as
commercially digitized material
To be able to get at the full library at any time without
items beingchecked out or unavailable, no matter what type
of document
Is there a niche for this campus in the greater scheme?
a) Government Documents: This library could
domore for digitizing state documents in order to provide
better access for state docs
b) Could participate in more cooperative projects
c) This campus has a unique position by virtue of having
Law, Medicine,Business, Engineering along with Liberal Arts.
We should demonstrate how these can be interconnected;
become more interdisciplinary inapproach and activities.
Better guidance for users and more user instruction as
part of digital services
Having a standardized interface for users
To have everything from the card catalog in the OPAC
Get better feedback from users--what do they really want?
Build in various methods of obtaining information from test
projects.
Question #2: What needs to be addressed in the design
of the collection?
Need access from off-campus (e.g. licensed
products)
Need to continually evaluate and balance the
infrastructure. What can it handle? How keep it advancing to
the next level of technology?
Need a guide map of suitable levels of assistance to
guide people toward relevant and appropriate sources
Need search interfaces that have different levels of
sophistication (basic vs. advanced). Sometimes this is
difference in vocabulary.
Discussion: Can a civil engineer do good searching in
electronic engineering resources? Are the terminologies
similar enough? Or would the person do an advanced level
search in one area but only basic in the other?
Library science students don't feel that knowing advanced
features of search engines help searches; that system
builders need to study how people use them.
Different interfaces may turn an advanced searcher from
one system into a novice searcher on another. Will canonical
interface solve this? Is it possible to use the same search
interface for several databases? Novice users should have
common interface, but advanced users should have more
options available.
Question #3: Beyond design, what are the three most
pressing issues facing this university as we begin to build
Digital Collections?
Staff training to support development of
services and funding to support staff
Need to determine ways of getting funds to develop
prototypes.
a) build partnerships on campus
b) grants
Equipment and preservation issues: Keeping formats
useable. Preserving informational content but also
maintaining artifactual value when necessary.
A new role for libraries: capturing ephemeral art for
archives
Collaboration with ITS is crucial: Make sure they know
what our needs are. ITS needs funding in order to provide
for our needs. Restructure administratively for better
communication.
More collaboration with other campus units: Continuing
Education & Distance Education. Connections are
increasing with TWIST, User Education programs, Departmental
libraries. Expand on these connections.
Question #4: How might workflow in support units
change?
New vocabulary presented by this symposium
indicates need for staff training
Restructure ITS/Libraries to be more collaborative
administratively.
Question raised: If too coordinated would it inhibit
experimentation and diversity?
Reduce intimidation by showing staff what's behind the
scenes. Show HTML structure behind the Web; show database
structure. Demystify the technology.
Nurture closer cooperation between Libraries and School
of Library and Information Science. Could be a more mutually
beneficial relationship.
Continue working with units such as the Center for
Teaching to learn more about faculty interests.
Explore use of researchers' databases via Sponsored
Programs
GIS brings a multitude of associations including
Geography, Regional and Urban Planning and others.
New technology and new opportunities can be daunting for
the staff. How to instill the excitement in the staff to buy
into the challenge. They have to see it serving a purpose
beyond the fact that "everybody's doing it."
Show how it improves library service.
Prioritize! The amount of workflow is doubled to keep up
"traditional" and add new at the same time.
Question #5: How can we best promote the availability
and use of new digital collections?
Publicity via e-mail, web pages, flyers
Instructional programs
Get into classrooms! Look at individual departments for
digital collection needs
Work with Continuing Education/Off-Campus/ICN for
off-campus publicity
Librarians need to perceive of themselves and promote the
perception of themselves as educators.
Discussion Group
4 [top]
Christine Lee - Discussion Leader
Lissa Lord - Recorder
Question #1: What do we want digital collections for
the campus to accomplish?
Timely display; accurate recreation of text
Wide area networking of A & I resources as well as
secondary reference sources
Better support of instructional development
Build electronic curriculum in the library
Rights Clearance (copyright, etc.)
Collaborative ventures with Library Science Department in
research and student utilization
Access to primary sources
Attention to format and mode of access
Support distance learning
Valid archives; authenticity of text
Enhanced reserve materials
Electronic reserves
Flexibility in construction, selection and output
Structuring material for ease of use
Question #2: What needs to be addressed in the design
of the collection?
Customized interface
User interface orientation
Portability and platform neutrality
Plan for technological change and evolution
Making sense of the environment for the user
Identification of resources
Aids of discovery (ie: metadata)
Change within user groups themselves (user base
sophistication)
Mindful of the limitations of the distance learner (ie:
downloading speed)
Develop useful core resources
Question #3: Beyond design, what are the three most
pressing issues facing this university as we begin to
address building digital collections?
a. Strong campus computing infrastructure
"The last mile of infrastructure" ... from
campus network to the user Staff resources; skills;
redefinition of responsibility
Money
b. Ask the customers --- User Needs
User acceptance of digital information and
academic use of technology
User ability to benefit from distributed remote design and
access
c. Encourage a "Politics of Sharing"
Collaboration --- breaking down barriers
Creation of a fabric of things that all fit together
Core collections for all users
Concept of "worldview" on campus and within the library
Question #4: What tools and skills should be the focus
for the next 3-5 years?
Technical expertise and training (HTML and
SGML coding as well as for Data Conversion)
Rights Management / Copyright
Preservation of medium and software
Evaluation of digital resources for the academic
community at the University of Iowa
Reference expertise
Evaluation and planning of ALL services (electronic as
well as all formats; various uses; subject classification)
Definition: Core Skill Set
Support for staff development (time off and financial
assistance)
Cataloging: conversion; training; support
Project management skills
Question #5: How can we best promote the availability
and use of new digital collections?
Face to face interaction with faculty and TAs
(buttonholing) (targeting)
One URL to promote library resources campus: market this
one URL aggressively ("Find out here ..." "Whatís new
--- one URL" "Everywhere --- One URL" ... on buses, taverns,
laundries, apartments, housing, etc.)
|